When a forensic pathologist testifies at a murder trial he describes bruises, lacerations & bullet holes. He does not decide whether the accused is guilty. Nor does he opine to the media about how such murders might be prevented.
So why do climate scientists think it’s their business to prescribe solutions – rather than telling us about their data and only about their data?
Read the
full post here.
This blog has relocated. Hope you like the fresh, new look. You can sign up to receive an e-mail each time a new post is added under the "Email subscription" bar a little below the photo.
NoFrakkingConsensus now has a Facebook page.